How to due with "warning LNK4075: ignoring '/INCREMENTAL' due to '/OPT:ICF' specification"

[Fresh]

Hi,

I met a problem, when I change warning level to 4 and to track warning
as error, then a link warning show
"warning LNK4075: ignoring '/INCREMENTAL' due to '/OPT:ICF'
specification"
I change the INCREMENTAL to default, then warnings disappeared, but
I'm not sure if it is the correct solution.
Any suggestion?

[Ian Collins]

Post by Fresh
Hi,
I met a problem, when I change warning level to 4 and to track warning
as error, then a link warning show
"warning LNK4075: ignoring '/INCREMENTAL' due to '/OPT:ICF'
specification"
I change the INCREMENTAL to default, then warnings disappeared, but
I'm not sure if it is the correct solution.
Any suggestion?

Ask of a group dedicated to your compiler.

[Bo Persson]

Post by Ian Collins

Post by Fresh
Hi,
I met a problem, when I change warning level to 4 and to track
warning as error, then a link warning show
"warning LNK4075: ignoring '/INCREMENTAL' due to '/OPT:ICF'
specification"
I change the INCREMENTAL to default, then warnings disappeared, but
I'm not sure if it is the correct solution.
Any suggestion?

Ask of a group dedicated to your compiler.

Where he will no doubt be told that INCREMENTAL adds extra padding to
the linked objects, so that they can be separately relinked later.
OPT:ICF on the other hand tries to reduce the executable size but
merging identical code blocks and removing unuse space.

Could there be a conflict there? :-)



Bo Persson